What are my rights if my employer hired me 3 years ago knowing that I had a possession of marijuana paraphernalia charge but has just now fired me because of it?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What are my rights if my employer hired me 3 years ago knowing that I had a possession of marijuana paraphernalia charge but has just now fired me because of it?
They fired me due to this possession and cited section 19 of the FDIC and how this charge constituted a dishonest act. My employer moved me out of state earlier this year and then terminated me leaving me in a tough situation. I would not have taken the job if I knew they were going to fire me for something they already knew about (from a background check they run on me). Is there a detrimental reliance issue?
Asked on November 29, 2015 under Employment Labor Law, Arizona
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 9 years ago | Contributor
1) Unless you had a written employment contract preventing you from being fired for this reason or in this way, they may fire you at any time, for any reason (i.e. without a contract, you are an "employee at will"), including a drug charge they already knew about.
2) Again, unless you had a written employment contract, you were an employee at will. Because an employee at will may be fired at any time, for any reason, there is no "detrimental reliance" issue or claim after 3 years: you could have been fired so many times, for so many reasons, during that span that any initial reliance is now moot. (Had this happened within 3 months, you might have had a claim.)
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.