Adverse possession – Florida
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Adverse possession – Florida
In-laws own Florida home for over 15 ys . Back portion of property has raised back lot w/upper cement patio which drops 10 ft. onto the neighbor’s. Property line has patio which continues down w/bushes and 6 ft. fence. It has been this way since the ownership. Neighbor claims line is 5 ft. over into in-laws property. After in-laws left to come back to Mich, neighbor cut down bushes, placed 6 ft. fence 5 ft. in in-laws property, including coming on to the property to place a 6 ft. fence 5 ft. in on the cement patio. What should they do?
Asked on May 15, 2009 under Real Estate Law, Michigan
Answers:
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 15 years ago | Contributor
Adverse possession is the taking of title to real estate by possessing it for a certain period of time. Title means ownership of real estate. The person claiming title to real estate by adverse possession must have actual possession of it that is open, notorious, exclusive and adverse to the claims of other persons to the title.
In Florida to claim real estate by adverse possession, a person must have possession for a period of seven (7) years and pay the assessed taxes. Florida Code §95.16-.18.
This adverse possession statute is very strict. Your in-laws should speak to an attorney in Florida to clarify any claim that they think they have.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.