Aggravated Stalking
Aggravated stalking is a felony charge that carries all of the same consequences and penalties as a regular felony offense. We’ll cover what happens if a pattern is proven, and the associated punishment.
Get Legal Help Today
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Mary Martin
Published Legal Expert
Mary Martin has been a legal writer and editor for over 20 years, responsible for ensuring that content is straightforward, correct, and helpful for the consumer. In addition, she worked on writing monthly newsletter columns for media, lawyers, and consumers. Ms. Martin also has experience with internal staff and HR operations. Mary was employed for almost 30 years by the nationwide legal publi...
Published Legal Expert
UPDATED: Jul 12, 2023
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
UPDATED: Jul 12, 2023
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
On This Page
What is aggravated stalking exactly, and what is the sentence? Aggravated stalking is a felony charge that can carry all of the same consequences and penalty as a regular felony offense. Some examples of stalking include following someone, driving by someone’s property, work, or school, secretly taking images or videos of someone, sending unwanted texts, emails, letters, or making explicit threats to an individual by telephone.
A person will be convicted of aggravated stalking when he or she follows, places under surveillance, or makes unconsented contact with another for the purpose of harassment or other intimidating behavior.
Despite constitutional challenges, a majority of states have some type of stalking statute and some also have aggravated stalking statutes. Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Missouri, Vermont, New Mexico, and Tennessee are some of the states which have provisions against aggravated stalking. Below we’ll go over the aggravated stalking definition, as well as a few different circumstances and sentences.
What are aggravating circumstances?
An aggravated stalking statute begins with a basic stalking allegation. Stalking usually requires some proof that a person repeatedly followed, harassed, or communicated with a victim in a way that caused the victim substantial emotional distress. Aggravated stalking requires this same stalking proof plus some other aggravating act or circumstance. Most include a violation of no-contact orders as an aggravating circumstance.
A no-contact with victim order could be included in a protective order, permanent restraining order, temporary restraining order, permanent injunction, preliminary injunction, bond condition, or any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct.
For example, if a person physically abused his girlfriend and the court allowed him to post bond subject to a condition that he have no contact with the victim, then the person could be charged with aggravated stalking if he tried to contact the victim without consent after his release.
Some states set out multiple aggravating circumstances. For example, Florida also aggravates stalking charges if a victim is younger than sixteen years of age or if the defendant makes a credible threat of bodily injury directed towards the victim.
When stalking is related to unlawful contact with a child under the age of 16, it is a third-degree felony punishable by five years in Florida State Prison and a $5,000 fine. Other states require some activity, not just words, that adds to the stalking component. Illinois authorizes aggravated stalking charges if the person causes harm to or constrains the victim.
Since stalking and aggravated stalking statutes are defined so broadly, the evidence required and the defenses to stalking charges tend to be challenging for prosecutors and defendants. The aggravated stalking offense could be alleged if the unlawful contact happens after a domestic violence protective order or injunction is ordered. The court must be able to prove a protective order was issued, the person knew it was issued and s/he voluntarily made an injunction violation
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What are the aggravating stalking defenses?
Generally, the state must show a pattern of conduct. A single incident of aggressive, annoying, or creepy behavior is not enough to support a stalking charge. Because the state is required to show repeated, committed actions, they are often permitted to introduce other things a defendant has done to the victim. This is somewhat different than other criminal cases where evidence is limited to the events that happened on a particular day.
Stalking is one of the few charges, which by design, authorizes and requires the admission of other bad acts. The entire history between the parties is admissible to show intent and to verify the reasonable fear experienced by the victim. This is an incredibly frustrating charge to defend because the defendant must defend a series of events, rather than one specific event on one specific day.
Despite this frustration, some defensive options are available in the reverse. When the state introduces a defendant’s history, a defendant can also introduce a history of a victim’s reactions to rebut the credible threat element required to support a conviction for stalking. Essentially, a defendant makes the argument that even though a victim had the opportunity to leave or avoid the defendant, the woman continued to have contact with the defendant, thereby demonstrating a lack of fear for her life.
Even though a small number of states have formal aggravated stalking statutes, other states have statutes that are comparable or punish the same type of conduct as a felony. For example, the conduct of constraint for an aggravated stalking charge in Illinois could also be considered unlawful restraint or kidnapping in other states. Regardless of how stalking conduct is labeled, aggravated stalking charges can result in serious felony consequences.
What is the punishment for aggravated stalking?
Simple stalking charges are usually classified as misdemeanor offenses but aggravated stalking is classified as a felony. Aggravated stalking can result in jail time. The range of punishment can range from two to ten years in prison. Because the offense is a felony, aggravated stalking can be enhanced under repeat felony offender statutes.
Many of these states also classify aggravated stalking as an offense against the family or household. This means that an aggravated stalking conviction could be used later to enhance a different type of assault family violence charge from a misdemeanor offense to a felony-level offense because of violent family history.
If a person is placed on probation for aggravated stalking, then the s/he could be required to undergo a psychological evaluation, participate in counseling, and refrain from any future contact with the victim. Essentially a protective order is built into the terms and conditions of the probation order.
If a person is accused of aggravated stalking via cyberstalking, then courts could also place restrictions on a defendant’s use of electronic equipment or access to computers. To qualify as a cyberstalker, the defendant must direct the content to a specific person. For example, it cannot be directed at a group of people, a race, or a team.
Case Studies: Aggravated Stalking
Case Study 1: Repeated Surveillance and Harassment
Sarah becomes obsessed with her former partner and starts following them, driving by their property, and sending unwanted messages. Despite the victim’s clear objections and requests to stop, Sarah continues her behavior. This pattern of repeated surveillance and harassment could lead to a charge of aggravated stalking.
Case Study 2: Unconsented Contact and Threats
John repeatedly contacts an individual, even after being explicitly told to stop. He sends explicit threats via telephone, causing significant emotional distress to the victim. John’s unconsented contact and explicit threats demonstrate a pattern of harassment that may result in a charge of aggravated stalking.
Case Study 3: Violation of No-Contact Order
Emma is issued a no-contact order as part of a protective order against her ex-partner. However, she intentionally violates the order by attempting to communicate with her ex-partner without consent. Emma’s violation of the no-contact order, combined with her previous stalking behavior, may lead to a charge of aggravated stalking.
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
The Bottom Line
If you’ve been wrongly accused of this criminal charge, it is important to have a criminal defense attorney with extensive experience who is well equipped to help you with your case and all the stress. An attorney can help you get your life back on track after allegations of stalking and find the best defense for fighting the charges. An allegation can lead to a criminal charge for a serious felony offense for making a credible threat or stalking after an injunction is entered.
If you need assistance, we offer a free online tool that can help you. All you need to do is enter your ZIP code.
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Mary Martin
Published Legal Expert
Mary Martin has been a legal writer and editor for over 20 years, responsible for ensuring that content is straightforward, correct, and helpful for the consumer. In addition, she worked on writing monthly newsletter columns for media, lawyers, and consumers. Ms. Martin also has experience with internal staff and HR operations. Mary was employed for almost 30 years by the nationwide legal publi...
Published Legal Expert
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.