Arrested before new laws of 2007 went into effect in AZ. Haven’t gone to court yet.
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Arrested before new laws of 2007 went into effect in AZ. Haven’t gone to court yet.
Friend was arrested for DUI on a suspended IN license (which was eligible for reinstatement, if that matters). The arrest was in AZ, and before the more strict laws went into effect- in the fall of 2005. He has not been to court. He lived in IN after that, didn’t go to the initial hearing. Will he be tried under new law? Is there a chance it would ‘disappear’ after any number of years? How should he proceed?
Asked on June 17, 2009 under Criminal Law, Arizona
Answers:
John Vigileos / Law Office Of John Vigileos
Answered 15 years ago | Contributor
The case will not disappear after a few years. If your friend does not appear he will continue to have a warrant hanging over his head in Arizona indefinitely. It is not clear from your question, but this DUI may have been charged as a felony DUI, since there was a suspended license involved. If this is a felony DUI, then he could be arrested on the warrant in Indiana (or any other state) and extradited back to Arizona. The misdemeanor DUI sentencing enhancements are not retroactive so, if this is a misdemeanor, he would be looking at the penalties under the old law. There have not been any recent substantial changes to the felony DUI statutes. DUI
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.