Can a lease be considered void if, other than the signature line,all places where the tenant was supposed to initial were unsigned?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Can a lease be considered void if, other than the signature line,all places where the tenant was supposed to initial were unsigned?
At the end of the lease agreement, both tenant and landlord signed. However, parts such as “Tenant agrees that failure to pay Rent when due shall be presumed to be a willful violation of the lease” where there was a line with the words “Initial” were not.
Asked on May 17, 2011 under Real Estate Law, Alabama
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
It is doubtful that this would void the contract or lease:
First, when construing leases and other contracts and determining whether they are enforceable, the courts will look to the entire agreement. If the agreement as a whole was signed, as you indicate it was, it is very likely that the court will conclude that all it's terms or paragraphs are themselves enforerceable.
Second, even if the court were to conclude that a specific paragraph or term is not enforceable for some reasons--such as if the court concluded that the term you cite had to be initiated separately--it would almost always enforce the rest of the contract, assumingit is possible to do so.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.