Can a waterpatrol arrest a person for DUI or anything related if the boat has been docked and nobody was in the boat ?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Can a waterpatrol arrest a person for DUI or anything related if the boat has been docked and nobody was in the boat ?
Asked on June 28, 2009 under Criminal Law, Missouri
Answers:
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 15 years ago | Contributor
Here's a statute that will help answer your question: http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C300-399/3060000165.HTM.
Based on the foregoing it appears that the dock was within their jurisdiction. As for the boat being empty, " Each water patrol officer, while investigating an accident or crime that was originally committed within such patrol officer's jurisdiction...may arrest any person who he or she has probable cause to believe has committed such crime, even if the suspect is currently out of the water patrol's jurisdiction."
Looks as though they were within their legal authority to charge you. However, I don't have all of the facts, to be certain of your rights you can speak to an attorney in your area that handles DUI cases. This is a technical area of the law and perhaps they can either have the charge thrownout or reduced (and the penalties minimized).
M.S., Member, Connecticut Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 15 years ago | Contributor
Although I do not practice law in MO, the general rule is that officers may arrest an individual if the officers have "probable cause" to believe that the suspect committed the crime. Remember, the "probable cause" standard to arrest is much lower than the "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" necessary to convict. With respect to your question what this means, in a practical sense, is that it may theoretically be possible for law enforcement officers to obtain probable cause to arrest for a DUI-related offense without actually witnessing operation (i.e., through witness statements, etc); however, their reliance on alternative forms of evidence may make it difficult to demonstrate the "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" necessary for conviction. I suggest that you consult with and/or retain a criminal defense attorney to discuss the strength of the state's evidence as well as the merits of any and all potential defenses that may be available to you, in the interest of obtaining the most favorable resolution of this charge as possible.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.