Wht constitutes a case of adverse possession?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Wht constitutes a case of adverse possession?
My neighbor just had his land surveyed and now it looks like our stone retaining wall is about a foot on his property. Noe he wants us to move it. The wall has been there about 25 years and we’ve been here 10 years. He claims the wall has moved over time but there’s no way to tell or even prove it. Plus, the wall is only about 3 feet high with a 150 lbs rocks on the bottom, so I doubt very much it moved. Is this a case of adverse possession? Is there anything I need to do legally (file/petition) to claim adverse possession? Should I make my move first or wait for him to make a move legally?
Asked on May 26, 2012 under Real Estate Law, Michigan
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
You should make the first move in an action based upon adverse possession or he will move to "quiet title" to the property. But you may have a time frame problem and you should seek legal consultation.
To establish a claim of adverse possession in Michigan, the claimant must offer proof of his or her possession of the land that is actual, visible, open notorious, exclusive, hostile and under claim of right.
It is the possession part that worries me most for you because in Michigan it must be uninterrupted for 15 years. in Michigan. Seek legal help. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.