If I have reasonable grounds to request the city building inspector come, do I risk the tenant using this against me in the bankruptcy process?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If I have reasonable grounds to request the city building inspector come, do I risk the tenant using this against me in the bankruptcy process?
I’m a commercial landlord currently eviting a tenant who is no longer under lease and is not paying rent properly. The tenant is not meeting our verbal agreements about making step by step moves to vacate the property (it is a dry cleaner). Although they have not said to me that they are filing bankruptcy, this is my concern. I have reasonable grounds to request the city building inspector come. If I do so, do I risk the tenant using this against me in the bankruptcy process? Perhaps suggesting that the landlord is harrassing them?
Asked on May 9, 2012 under Real Estate Law, California
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
If you have a legitimate reason for having the city building inspector to inspect your commercial business, such inspection will have no bearing if your tenant files for bankrupty protection or not and will not be able to be used against you in any bankruptcy proceeding.
You need to remember that a bankruptcy proceeding is designed to allow a debtor the opportunity to discharge his or her debt or at least reorganize the monthly payments owed to creditors. The inspection assuming the inspector writes up a realistic assessment of the building should have no bearing concerning any claims of harassment.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.