Can someone explain wage garnishment exemptions for a credit card debt judgement?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Can someone explain wage garnishment exemptions for a credit card debt judgement?
The current law says 85% of gross wages are exempt. My gross is $1271 bi-weekly with 85% of that equaling $1080, the remaining 15% being $190. I don’t know if this means $190 is taken from my net pay after taxes or if it means the $190 is available for garnishment but not before taxes are taken out – which leaves literally nothing for creditors to take. But the law reads that 85% of my gross pay is exempt, meaning I should expect that amount in my check (unless taxes takes out more). I’m just looking for clarity .
Asked on July 21, 2012 under Bankruptcy Law, Massachusetts
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
From what you have written with respect to the laws of your state as to the 85% of your gross pay being exempt from garnsihment, such means that $190 of your pay is subject to garnishment on a bi-weekly period.
If you have deductions from your bi-weekly pay, such deductions are still taken BUT do not apply as a credit to reduce the gross pay amount.
As such, $190 would be up for grabs each pay period for a wage garnishment concerning a judgment against you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.