If a 501c3 organization owned/operated a fire truck and allowed occupants to ride on top of the truck in unsecured positions, could it be held liable if someone was injured?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If a 501c3 organization owned/operated a fire truck and allowed occupants to ride on top of the truck in unsecured positions, could it be held liable if someone was injured?
Could the operator of the fire truck and the organization be held to any civil or criminal litigation in the event of an accident that resulted in injury to person(s) riding on top of the truck at the time of the accident? Does the signing of a “Waver” have any difference?
Asked on November 10, 2014 under Personal Injury, Texas
Answers:
S.L,. Member, California Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 10 years ago | Contributor
The organization will be liable for injuries to people riding on top of the fire truck whether they are secured or unsecured.
Liability will include medical bills, pain and suffering ( an amount in addition to the medical bills based on the medical reports documenting the nature and extent of the injuries) and wage loss.
This would be a civil case (lawsuit).
There may be a separate criminal case if riding unsecured on top of the fire truck violates a law or is construed as criminal negligence or reckless endangerment.
The criminal and civil cases are separate.
A waiver will be ineffective.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.