If I’m a tenant and there are bed bugs, does the landlord have to pay for a nice hotel for me to stay in or can they just pay $100 a night?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If I’m a tenant and there are bed bugs, does the landlord have to pay for a nice hotel for me to stay in or can they just pay $100 a night?
I’m paying $2,000 per month.
Asked on June 12, 2015 under Real Estate Law, California
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 9 years ago | Contributor
The landlord does not necessarily have to pay for a hotel at all. First, it's not a given that you have to move out if there are bedbugs--most tenants with bedbugs remain in place while they are being treated, and that's considered the norm or acceptable.
Second, the landlord is not at fault or liable for costs or compensation if he did take or is taking reasonsble steps to deal with the problem--e.g. bringing in an exterminator. The landlord's obligation is just to do what is reasonable; he does not "insurer" you against there being pests, since pests happen in rental units and the landlord's responsibility is to simply deal with them when they do. If the landlord took reasonble steps and is not at fault, he would not owe you compensation, so if you choose to go to a hotel, that is your choice and cost.
Finally, if your unit were not habitable--the infestation was that bad--then you'd typically be entitled to rent abatement (to not paying rent for the time it is uninhabitable), which would be around $60-70 per night, based on your rent. The landlord generally does not have to go over and above the rent you are paying him.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.