If a garnishment was canceled because the law office thoughtI no longer worked for my employer, how long does it take for them to start another garnishment?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If a garnishment was canceled because the law office thoughtI no longer worked for my employer, how long does it take for them to start another garnishment?
My employer did withhold 25% of my income for 7 months to satisfy the debt; it was one payment away from being finished with the garnishment. They contacted the company to find out they thought I no longer worked for my company so they canceled the judgment. Now my company is sending me a check for what they withheld. I want to negotiate with the creditor for a lower amount. What rights do I have?
Asked on November 14, 2011 under Bankruptcy Law, Alaska
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
If the wage garnishment ended because the judgment creditor thought that the amount that you owed on the judgment was satisfied, the creditor can start another wage garnishment with your employer if it desires. It can take a couple of months to reinstate it. Your rights are that you owe the money and 25% of your wages per paycheck can be withheld.
Rather than going through the the trouble of having to deal with such a proceeding, I would reach an agreement with the creditor to pay the balance off in monthly installments since you are so close to getting the full satisfaction of the judgment.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.