If modification to a lease is not signed by the guarantor (a third party) is it still binding?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If modification to a lease is not signed by the guarantor (a third party) is it still binding?
A guarantor was required originally.The original guaranty agreement states that, “Guarantor shall be liable for modifications, amendments, or extensions” and “Releasing or assignment of the lease by resident with or without Guarantor’s approval shall no affect Guarantor’s liability”. However, on the new amendment it requires that all 3 parties agree to the modification. Is the new amendment still binding if their signature is not present?
Asked on June 30, 2012 under Real Estate Law, New Mexico
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
From what you write, under the terms of the original guaranty, the guarantor would still be liable for this modification or amendment, since the plain language of the original guaranty would have him be liable. While the guarantor could be released from his obligation by the other parties, given the clear language of the original guaranty, it would most likely take a more explicit or express release than merely having an amendment with a place for him to sign--rather, there should be a document expressly stating that the guarantor is released from his obligations under the original guarantry, which is signed by the various parties.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.