If I had a pacemaker implanted but the procedure was not done properly so had I had to undergo a second operation, do I have any recourse against the first doctor?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If I had a pacemaker implanted but the procedure was not done properly so had I had to undergo a second operation, do I have any recourse against the first doctor?
It was implanted 5 months ago due to a slow heart rate. After the surgery I was having a problem raising my arm over my head. I still had a slow heart rate and was not feeling well. I had to have the pacer relocated by a second doctor. Pryor to surgery he told me that one wire was not connected properly. After surgery he told me that the wires were sutured to a muscle and that it could have damaged a nerve. I still can’t raise my arm over my head without feeling pain. It’s seems I can’t support the weight of my arm.
Asked on May 26, 2015 under Malpractice Law, Pennsylvania
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 9 years ago | Contributor
Based on what you write, you may well have recourse. Malpractice is medical negligence, or carelessness--when a a doctor is negligent, he may be liable, or financially responsible, for costs the patient suffers due to the negligence (like the cost of a second operation), or other monetary losses (like lost wages, if you missed work), and even for pain and suffering for disability or life impairment lasting weeks or longer (like losing some motion/use of an arm). Since misconnecting a pacemaker wire would seem to be negligent, this may be malpractice. You should consult with a malpractice attorney to evaluate your potential case.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.