Is an employer in Washington State required to cash out your PTO at resignation?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Is an employer in Washington State required to cash out your PTO at resignation?
I resigned and gave my proper 2 weeks notice.
My employer has refused to pay out my PTO. Is
this their right?
Asked on February 20, 2018 under Employment Labor Law, Washington
Answers:
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 6 years ago | Contributor
Private sector employers are not legally required to provide earned but unused PTO or vacation time pay to a departing employee. That having been said, if promised, such pay must be granted. Further, even if state law does not expressly require employers to provide PTO/vacation pay out upon termination, established policy will control. Accordingly, if their practices, policies or statements rise to the level of creating a “promise” of such pay, then the employer may create a binding legal obligation to provided it.
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 6 years ago | Contributor
Private sector employers are not legally required to provide earned but unused PTO or vacation time pay to a departing employee. That having been said, if promised, such pay must be granted. Further, even if state law does not expressly require employers to provide PTO/vacation pay out upon termination, established policy will control. Accordingly, if their practices, policies or statements rise to the level of creating a “promise” of such pay, then the employer may create a binding legal obligation to provided it.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.