Is it illegal to refuse or charge a tenant for a final walk-through in order to see how much of your deposit you will receive?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Is it illegal to refuse or charge a tenant for a final walk-through in order to see how much of your deposit you will receive?
My apartment complex is refusing to let me do a final walk-through. They also tried to charge me for a few more days rent in order to set up a walk-through. Is this illegal?
Asked on July 9, 2012 under Real Estate Law, California
Answers:
Cameron Norris, Esq. / Law Office of Gary W. Norris
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
They don't have to do a walk through with you. They should, but there is no law requiring them to have you be present when they do a walk through. Take a video camera and document the apartment (well). Tell them you documented the apartment and expect your whole deposit back.
Let them inspect it on their own terms. If they refuse to give you back your whole deposit, don't cash any check they give you and sue in small claims court. In your small claims case cite California Civil Code Section 1950.5.
California Civil Code Section 1950.5 says that if your landlord in bad faith retains your deposit, you can be awarded statutory damages equal to twice the deposit amount, in addition to whatever real damages are awarded. That means if your real damages are the full deposit, you can be awarded up to three times the deposit amount in all.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.