Is it legal for an employer to require an STD check and physical for a prep cook position?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Is it legal for an employer to require an STD check and physical for a prep cook position?
Secondly, can they withhold your check for not getting it done within 3 days? And Lastly, if they make it a point to bring up sexual harrassment multiple times over the training period and the manager pulls her blouse down as an example, isn’t that sexual harrassment?
Asked on December 18, 2015 under Employment Labor Law, California
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 9 years ago | Contributor
1) As you have found out, withholding the check is illegal.
2) Generally, an employer may require a physical if it is in any way reasonably related to the job: so a prep cook could be required to prove he/she is healthy and not carrying one of a number of communicable conditions or illnesses which he/she could potentially pass on to customers.
3) However, unless you are doing something *very* odd with the food, the only STD that might seem to possibly be relevant would be HIV/AIDS, since if you cut yourself, in theory, in very unlikely but not entirely impossible, circumstances, the illness could be passed by your blood. Otherwise, though, STDs are not relavant to the job and/or customer (or coworker) safety, and focusing on STDs could itself be a form of sexual harassment (since it's bringing up a sexualized situation).
4) Your manager pulling down her blouse is very likely sexual harassment, as you suspect.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.