Is the smell of marijuana probable cause to search a vehicle?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Is the smell of marijuana probable cause to search a vehicle?
Defendant is stopped for a headlight violation and steps out of car to approach police cruiser with valid license in hand. Officer then asks to see vehicle registration. Defendant walks back to car, opens door, and reaches into glove compartment to get title. With door open, defendant drops registration right under open door. Officer picks up document but now smells marijuana as his head is in the open car door. Officer then searches the car finding 10 tin foil packets of marijuana in the glove box. On what grounds can the evidence be suppressed?
Asked on November 17, 2011 under Criminal Law, Illinois
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
Assuming marijuana is illegal in your state (California allows it in certain circumstances) and a law enforcement officer smells marijuana coming from your vehicle after you were stopped because of a headlight violation, there is probable cause to search your vehicle as a result.
Marijuana presumably is a controlled substance in your state. Given the fact that law enforcement smelled an illegal substance coming from your car. there was a basis to search it and whatever found is the legal result of the search. I suggest that you retain a criminal defense attorney for your situation.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.