Is there a difference between a threat and a warning legally speaking?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Is there a difference between a threat and a warning legally speaking?
Asked on August 16, 2015 under Criminal Law, Michigan
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 9 years ago | Contributor
If the "warning" was a warning that a person would use violence under certain circumstances or do some act which is itself illegal, like damaging or destroying another's property, it was an illegal threat. Someone may never legally threaten to commit an act of violence or a criminal act. Other threats or warnings are legal, so long as the action threatened is legal: e.g. an employer's threat to fire an employee; a threat to sue someone if they breach a contract or damage your property; etc. These are legal because the person has a right to do these things.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.