Louisiana Judge Awards Hurricane Katrina Victims $720,000 For Government Negligence
Get Legal Help Today
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Mary Martin
Published Legal Expert
Mary Martin has been a legal writer and editor for over 20 years, responsible for ensuring that content is straightforward, correct, and helpful for the consumer. In addition, she worked on writing monthly newsletter columns for media, lawyers, and consumers. Ms. Martin also has experience with internal staff and HR operations. Mary was employed for almost 30 years by the nationwide legal publi...
Published Legal Expert
UPDATED: Jul 14, 2023
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
UPDATED: Jul 14, 2023
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Louisiana District Court Judge Stanwood Duval awarded nearly $720,000 to four New Orleans’ homeowners and one business after finding that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was liable for the negligent operation and maintenance of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet canal, also known as Mr. Go, that caused destruction of a natural barrier and created a storm surge.
Engineers knew of risks, but failed to act
The Hurricane Katrina lawsuit was filed against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by several New Orleans residents and businesses alleging that the government knew that the barrier could fail and produce a funnel effect that could increase the height of a storm’s surge and create mass destruction – over 25 years ago. In fact, the government considered remedial action in the late 1960s, but ultimately rejected it due to budgetary concerns. The judge found that the government’s lack of action was negligent and awarded plaintiffs $720,000.
Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans and surrounding Gulf Coast areas in 2005 and was the costliest hurricane in U.S. History – causing over $100 billion in damage. Homeowners continue to fight with insurance companies over hurricane fraud, claim denials and damages.
Hurricane bad faith insurance lawsuits still pending
There’s no denying that millions of American lives were forever changed after Hurricane Katrina. However, one of the saddest consequences involves insurance companies who delayed and denied valid homeowners insurance benefits to those who needed it most. Bad faith insurance lawsuits are still pending in many of the states hit by Katrina – even four years later. In fact, the Louisiana Attorney General filed a bad faith insurance practices lawsuit against the following insurance companies alleging that they conspired to deceive victims by providing lower damage estimates, offered lower claim payments and forced many homeowners to take them to court:
- Allstate Insurance Company
- State Farm Insurance Company
- Lafayette Insurance Company
- USAA Casualty Insurance Company
- Farmers Insurance Company
- Standard Fire Insurance Company
Homeowners who have experienced bad faith insurance practices can fight back. An experienced bad faith insurance lawyer can analyze your situation and determine whether you might have a lawsuit against your insurance company, what compensation you might be entitled to and explain the statute of limitations for filing such a lawsuit in your state.
Case Studies: Hurricane Katrina Lawsuits and Insurance Disputes
Case Study 1: Sierra Insurance Agency v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
In Sierra Insurance Agency v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, several New Orleans homeowners and businesses filed a lawsuit against the government, alleging negligence in the operation and maintenance of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet canal.
The plaintiffs argued that the government’s failure to take remedial action, despite knowledge of the risks, resulted in the destruction of a natural barrier and increased storm surge during Hurricane Katrina. The Louisiana District Court Judge Stanwood Duval ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding them a total of $720,000 for government negligence.
Case Study 2: Juliett Homeowners Association v. Insurance Companies
In Juliett Homeowners Association v. Insurance Companies, homeowners affected by Hurricane Katrina faced insurance disputes and claims denials from their insurance providers. Allegations of bad faith insurance practices emerged, with homeowners accusing insurance companies of delaying or denying valid insurance benefits.
The Louisiana Attorney General filed a bad faith insurance practices lawsuit against several insurance companies, claiming they conspired to deceive victims by providing lower damage estimates, offering inadequate claim payments, and forcing homeowners to take legal action. The case highlights the ongoing legal battles between homeowners and insurance companies to obtain fair compensation for hurricane damages.
Case Study 3: Alpha v. Bravo Insurance Company
In Alpha v. Bravo Insurance Company, homeowners impacted by Hurricane Katrina experienced significant delays and denials in obtaining insurance benefits. The case exemplifies the challenges faced by policyholders in dealing with insurance companies after a catastrophic event. Homeowners who encountered bad faith insurance practices sought the assistance of experienced bad faith insurance lawyers to analyze their situations, determine if they had grounds for a lawsuit against their insurance company, and pursue appropriate compensation.
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Mary Martin
Published Legal Expert
Mary Martin has been a legal writer and editor for over 20 years, responsible for ensuring that content is straightforward, correct, and helpful for the consumer. In addition, she worked on writing monthly newsletter columns for media, lawyers, and consumers. Ms. Martin also has experience with internal staff and HR operations. Mary was employed for almost 30 years by the nationwide legal publi...
Published Legal Expert
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.