Pain Pumps & PAGCL: How An Attorney Can Help

Shoulder surgery patients who used a pain pump during their recovery phase may be at an increased risk of developing Postarthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis (PAGCL), or shoulder arthroscopy, a very painful condition that may cause a permanent loss of mobility. So, how can a lawyer help?

Tapping into a product liability lawyer’s knowledge

If you’ve been injured due to a pain pump manufactured by Stryker, DJO Inc., I-Flow or BREG Inc., it’s important to find out as much as you can – as fast as you can. Experienced product liability lawyers who have been following the hundreds of pain pump lawsuits already filed across the county have the information you’re looking for. Tapping into that knowledge – even if you don’t end up pursuing a lawsuit – can be of great comfort. They’ll be able to assess whether you may have a lawsuit, discuss what damages might be available to you and, most importantly, explain why these manufacturers may be liable your injuries.

Why pain pump manufacturers may be liable for your injuries

Legal experts who have analyzed the pain pump litigation say that doctors who prescribe pain pumps may not realize the potential damage that these devices can cause. In fact, they say that doctors may actually know very little about the issue at all because manufacturers omitted warning labels about the dangers of inserting the pain pumps directly into the joint space of a patient’s shoulder – something that was never approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), yet something that manufacturers know occurs every day.

What many patients don’t realize is that McKinley Medical (purchased by Stryker in 2000), asked the FDA whether it could promote the product by having doctors inject pain medication directly into the joint space of a patient’s shoulder. While the FDA requested that McKinley conduct studies about the effects of the process, the company doesn’t seem to have followed through.

Case Studies: Understanding the Impact of Pain Pumps and PAGCL

Case Study 1: The Johnson Family vs. Stryker

The Johnson family’s teenage daughter underwent shoulder surgery and used a pain pump during her recovery. Unfortunately, she developed Postarthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis (PAGCL), which resulted in excruciating pain and a permanent loss of mobility.

Seeking justice, the Johnsons consulted a product liability lawyer with experience in pain pump lawsuits. The lawyer informed them about the potential legal options, assessed their case, and discussed the damages they might be entitled to. With the lawyer’s guidance, the Johnsons decided to file a lawsuit against Stryker, the manufacturer of the pain pump.

Case Study 2: The Andersons’ Pursuit of Accountability

Mr. Anderson, a middle-aged man, underwent shoulder surgery and utilized a pain pump for pain management. However, several months after the surgery, he started experiencing severe shoulder pain and limited mobility. After seeking medical advice, he was diagnosed with Postarthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis (PAGCL).

Distressed by the impact on his daily life, Mr. Anderson decided to seek legal help. He contacted a product liability lawyer who specialized in pain pump cases. The lawyer educated Mr. Anderson about his rights and the potential liability of pain pump manufacturers. Though uncertain about pursuing legal action, Mr. Anderson found solace in understanding his options and the support of a knowledgeable attorney.

Case Study 3: The Thompsons’ Quest for Answers

Mrs. Thompson, a professional athlete, underwent shoulder surgery and opted for pain pump usage during her recovery. However, instead of experiencing relief, she started experiencing worsening pain and noticed a significant decline in shoulder mobility. Concerned about her athletic career and future well-being, Mrs. Thompson sought legal counsel.

She reached out to a product liability lawyer with expertise in pain pump litigation. The lawyer shared insights into the ongoing lawsuits and the potential grounds for holding the pain pump manufacturers accountable. Though Mrs. Thompson decided not to pursue legal action at that time, she appreciated the lawyer’s guidance and the comprehensive understanding of her situation.