What is the statute of limitations on a student loan over-award?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What is the statute of limitations on a student loan over-award?
A student loan company I used in 1991-1996 recently contacted me and informed me that I still owe them over $1200 from an award over-payment in 1991. They said it was a loan. All my loans with them are paid for, so wouldn’t this also be paid for? And what is the statute of limitations of this? Is it possible to be over-awarded on a student loan? I contacted Direct Loan (Dept of Education) and they said the federal database shows I owe this company nothing. They have no Stafford loans with me. This is affecting my credit.
Asked on November 2, 2010 under Bankruptcy Law, Oklahoma
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 14 years ago | Contributor
You have a right on every loan disbursed to you to see an accounting of the entire loan, disbursements and payouts. I would ask them to send you a complete printout of the lona as well as a copy of the cashed disbursement checks. Let them prove that you owe the money. As for the credit bureaus, contact each one and dispute the transaction. The loan company will then have 30 days to explain. 9 times out of 10 they miss the deadline and the issue resolves itself. But I would also seek help from attorney in your area as to this matter. It would definitely seem that the statute of limitations has run on this matter. I would double check. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.