If a tenant kept a dog without my consent and the carpet had to be replaced which cost me a few days rent from a new tenant, what are my rights?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
If a tenant kept a dog without my consent and the carpet had to be replaced which cost me a few days rent from a new tenant, what are my rights?
I’m a private landlord. My tenant moved out and I found out they had dog. Carpet stained so bad not normal wear after 18 months. New tenant wouldn’t move in and wanted a refund on days they couldn’t move in. What can I take out of previous tenant’s deposit for this breach?
Asked on November 10, 2011 under Real Estate Law, California
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
Good question. The amount that you can hold back from your former teannt's security deposit for the carpet damage you write about is determined by the written lease agreement (assuming you have one).
Its terms control the obligations owed to you by the former tenant and vice versa in the absence of conflicting state law. Read your agreement carefully on the subject to damages and the use of the security deposit.
Most likely the only amount that you can legally withhold from the former tenant's security deposit is the amount to cover the replacement of the damaged carpet. The delay on the tenant's move in (new tenant) can be pushed on the back end of the lease so you essentially have not lost any money in the big picture.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.