Uncashed MoneyGram Money Orders Are Stuck in Delaware
Get Legal Help Today
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Mary Martin
Published Legal Expert
Mary Martin has been a legal writer and editor for over 20 years, responsible for ensuring that content is straightforward, correct, and helpful for the consumer. In addition, she worked on writing monthly newsletter columns for media, lawyers, and consumers. Ms. Martin also has experience with internal staff and HR operations. Mary was employed for almost 30 years by the nationwide legal publi...
Published Legal Expert
UPDATED: Jun 28, 2016
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
UPDATED: Jun 28, 2016
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
On This Page
Twenty-one states have filed a lawsuit against Delaware, seeking to take back more than $150 million in uncashed money orders.
Delaware law requires that financial institutions incorporated under its laws turn over all unclaimed funds to Delaware. Because MoneyGram was incorporated in Delaware, all of its uncashed money orders must, by law, go to the state. However, this lawsuit claims that this requirement is a violation of the Disposition Act of 1974. See 12 USC Ch.26 § 2503.
States Cry Foul on Delaware’s Unclaimed Funds Law
Texas and Arkansas are the two states leading the lawsuit. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton says that this federal law allows unused funds like money orders and travelers checks to be claimed by the state in which they were purchased.
In a press conference announcing the suit, Paxton stated, “Delaware is ignoring controlling federal law in exchange for financial gain…They have hundreds of millions of dollars that rightfully belongs to taxpayers of our states…They’ve had our money over the last several years, they’ve kept our money…Delaware has the money. The business itself doesn’t have the money, they were ordered by Delaware to send the money to Delaware. So, we’re just trying to get what is owed to us.”
Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge has stated that “such abandoned and unclaimed property should be turned over to the state where the property was purchased” and asserts that the taxpayers of Arkansas have been robbed.
Delaware Says Tell It To the Supreme Court
Delaware Finance Secretary Thomas Cook has stated that this lawsuit is redundant. “This issue has been the subject of two prior lawsuits, filed by Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, against Delaware in federal district courts earlier this year…Delaware disputes the allegations in those suits and, to bring some clarity to this issue, filed an action in the U.S. Supreme Court last week to resolve the outstanding legal question. Delaware cannot speculate why Texas did not intervene in the existing Supreme Court case, but is hopeful that the Supreme Court will provide all states with guidance on how companies should handle this particular type of unclaimed property in the future.”
Earlier this this year, Pennsylvania sued Delaware for $10.2 million worth of abandoned MoneyGram checks purchased in Pennsylvania between 2000 and 2009. Wisconsin also sued for more than $13 million.
The states suing Delaware are: Arkansas, Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. If additional states join the lawsuit, $400 million in funds could potentially be at risk.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Supreme Court because it a dispute amongst the states. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to hear disputes between states.
Moneygram spokesperson, Michelle Buckalew, has said, “This is a dispute among states over which state has the priority to property escheated to the State of Delaware in good faith by MoneyGram. MoneyGram will comply with the decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court.”
A recent task force studied how Delaware collects its revenue. It determined that claimed abandoned property, which includes money orders, accounts for 15% of Delaware’s income. This is the third largest source of revenue for Delaware.
(Photo Credit: “Moneygram” by Mike Mozart is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.)
Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Mary Martin
Published Legal Expert
Mary Martin has been a legal writer and editor for over 20 years, responsible for ensuring that content is straightforward, correct, and helpful for the consumer. In addition, she worked on writing monthly newsletter columns for media, lawyers, and consumers. Ms. Martin also has experience with internal staff and HR operations. Mary was employed for almost 30 years by the nationwide legal publi...
Published Legal Expert
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.