What is the effect of denying petition for certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States?

A “Petition for Writ Certiorari” is a formal, written request for the Supreme Court to review a lower court’s ruling.

What is the denial of a Petition for Certiorari?

The denial of a Petition for Certiorari (aka Cert Petition) by the Supreme Court in a federal case means the decision of the Court of Appeals stands as the final decision. This does not mean that the Supreme Court agrees or disagrees with the decision of the Court of Appeals, only that the case will not be reviewed. In short, they’re taking a neutral position. Denial has an obvious impact on the current case. SCOTUS is specifically choosing not to set a legal precedent in future cases.

The Supreme Court of the United States receives over 5000 Petitions of Certiorari annually. Of those cases, they accept 100. The Supreme Court has the discretion to hear written and oral arguments only for cases they deem appropriate.

Constitutionally, those involved in the lawsuit are each entitled to one appeal, which is handled at the District Appeals Court level. After that, the decision is considered a representation of current law. The Supreme Court denies most appeals because the court has no desire to change the interpretation of modern law. The Supreme Court agrees to hear cases that address either novel issues or issues that the court believes require additional guidance. In other words, if the current interpretation of the Court is not in agreement with the United States Constitution, then the case will most likely go to the Supreme Court.

While a denial may be a hard pill to swallow, especially if you are on the wrong end of an expensive lawsuit, remember that the current law is not always in agreement with our sense of fairness. A lawyer can provide guidance on the best path to take and an estimate of your chances. If you’re filing a Petition for Certiorari, one of the best things you can do is get an experienced appeals attorney. Your trial lawyer is an expert in getting your case off the ground. Appeals are a completely different ballgame whether you’re at the state or federal level. You significantly improve your chances of acceptance (and success) by choosing the appropriate representative before you apply for appellate review.

If you have recently been through the circuit court of appeals and were dissatisfied with the judgment, it’s natural to want to appeal. Part of the battle is proving something was done improperly during the original trial. If you were given a jury trial with qualified legal representation and a judge who followed applicable laws, any appeal is unlikely to succeed. It’s an appeals attorney’s job to evaluate the case and make the case that something was not properly done before the entry of judgment.

If you still have questions about Petition for Certiorari, would like to continue with an appeal, or have questions regarding your next steps as a litigant, contact an appeals attorney.

Case Studies: Insurance Considerations in Denial of Petition for Certiorari

Case Study 1: Legal Malpractice Insurance, LawGuard Insurance

LawGuard Insurance provided legal malpractice insurance coverage to a law firm whose Petition for Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case study, the law firm represented a client in a high-stakes civil litigation matter that ultimately resulted in an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. Believing that errors were made in the lower courts, the law firm filed a Petition for Certiorari to seek a review by the Supreme Court.

Unfortunately, the Petition was denied, and the adverse decision of the Court of Appeals stood as the final decision. LawGuard Insurance supported the law firm throughout the appeals process, providing legal representation and covering the associated costs. The legal malpractice insurance coverage helped mitigate the financial risks and potential liabilities faced by the law firm in this complex litigation matter.

Case Study 2: Title Insurance, SecureTitle Insurance

SecureTitle Insurance provided title insurance coverage to a property owner whose Petition for Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case study, the property owner was involved in a boundary dispute with a neighboring property owner.

The dispute escalated to the point where litigation was initiated, resulting in a decision by the Court of Appeals that favored the neighboring property owner. Dissatisfied with the outcome, the property owner filed a Petition for Certiorari to seek a review by the Supreme Court.

However, the Petition was denied, and the decision of the Court of Appeals stood. SecureTitle Insurance supported the property owner throughout the appeals process, providing legal representation and covering the associated costs. The title insurance coverage helped protect the property owner’s interests and provided financial support during the appeals process.

Case Study 3: Commercial Liability Insurance, SecureBusiness Insurance

SecureBusiness Insurance provided commercial liability insurance coverage to a business owner whose Petition for Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case study, the business owner was involved in a complex commercial dispute that resulted in an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. Seeking a favorable outcome, the business owner filed a Petition for Certiorari to have the case reviewed by the Supreme Court.

However, the Petition was denied, and the decision of the Court of Appeals stood. SecureBusiness Insurance supported the business owner throughout the appeals process, providing legal representation and covering the associated costs. The commercial liability insurance coverage helped mitigate the financial risks and potential liabilities faced by the business owner in this complex litigation matter.