Would it be considered a “implied contract” if they agree to pay you back via email orsocial networkmessage?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Would it be considered a “implied contract” if they agree to pay you back via email orsocial networkmessage?
So I sent my ex $600 (while we were together) to help her with her rent cause she said she had lost her job. A little while later I found out she lied about this so I asked for the money back and she has stopped talking to me. She will not answer back to any of my messages or answer any of my phone calls. I am wondering if the message traffic between us would be considered legally binding and hold up? I also have the document from my bank with the transfer information on it from when I sent her the money. She stated in the message traffic on 2 different occasions that she will pay me back.
Asked on November 14, 2011 under Bankruptcy Law, Kansas
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
IF you had an agreement made with you ex-wife that the money was a loan and she would repay it, and this agreement was made prior to actually lending her the money, then that would be an enforceable contract, and you could enforce it as per its terms--e.g. she'd have to repay you when and under the terms of the agreement. The emails, etc. would be evidence of the existence and terms of the contract or agreement.
On the other hand, if the money had been given to her as a gift--without expectation of repayment *at the time* you gave it to her--you may not be able to recover it. Gifts are normally not recoverable by the gift giver.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.